Metástasis Pancreática Metacrónica de un Carcinoma de Células Renales. Reporte de un Caso / Metachronic Pancreatic Metastasis of a Renal Cell Carcinoma. Case Report

El carcinoma de células renales (CCR) a nivel mundial presenta una incidencia de 431.288 casos anuales, causando 179.368 muertes en 2020. Sin embargo, a pesar de su incidencia, el desarrollo de metástasis pancreática (MP) de un RCC es un hecho inusual. El objetivo de este manuscrito fue reportar el caso de una paciente con una MP metacrónica de un CCR. Se trata de una paciente de 56 años, sexo femenino, nefrectomizada derecha hace 132 meses por un CCR, en adyuvancia con inmunoterapia. En un control imagenológico de rutina, se le pesquisó una lesión de aspecto tumoral en el cuerpo y cola del páncreas. Se intervino quirúrgicamente, realizándose una pancreatectomía córporo-caudal con preservación esplénica. Evolucionó de forma satisfactoria, sin complicaciones, siendo dada de alta al 4º día de su cirugía. El informe del estudio de la pieza operatoria con estudio inmunohistoquímico concluyó que se trataba de una MP de CCR. La paciente se encuentra en buenas condiciones generales y reinició quimioterapia con anticuerpos monoclonales. El seguimiento frecuente y prolongado de pacientes con antecedentes de CCR, facilita un diagnóstico y tratamiento oportuno de MP facilitando el mejor pronóstico de los pacientes, con tasas más altas de supervivencia.

SUMMARY: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) worldwide has an incidence of 431,288 cases per year, causing 179,368 deaths in 2020. However, despite its incidence, the development of pancreatic metastasis (MP) from RCC is unusual. The aim of this manuscript was to report the case of a patient with a PM of a RCC. This is a 56-year-old female patient, underwent right nephrectomy 132 months earlier for RCC. While she was in adjuvant immunotherapy, in a routine imaging control, it was found a tumor lesion in the body and the tail of the pancreas. So, she underwent surgery, performing a corpora-caudal pancreatectomy with splenic preservation. Postoperative evolution was correct, without complications, and she was discharged on the 4th day after surgery. The report of the study of the surgical piece with an immunohistochemical study included, conclusive of PM of RCC. Currently, the patient is in good general condition and restarted chemotherapy with monoclonal antibodies. Frequent and prolonged follow-up of patients with a history of RCC facilitates timely diag- nosis and treatment of PM, facilitating the best prognosis for patients, with higher survival rates.

Metástasis de cáncer de células claras renal en cuerdas vocales. Reporte de un caso / Metastasis of renal clear cell carcinoma in vocal cords. A Case report

Introducción: Las metástasis a distancia de tumores primarios a cuerdas vocales son poco frecuentes. Las metástasis a laringe con mayor frecuencia corresponden a melanomas y carcinomas, afectando principalmente a la región supraglótica. Las metástasis a cabeza y cuello de los carcinomas de células renales (CCR) tienen una incidencia de 14-16%. Se presenta el caso de un paciente con metástasis de carcinoma de células claras renal a cuerdas vocales, cuya importancia recae en que es un caso poco frecuente y no existen reportes similares en el país. Paciente masculino, 57 años, con disfonía de 3 meses de evolución. Nasofibroscopía evidencia lesión polipoídea en cuerda vocal y ventrículo izquierdo. Se realiza microcirugía laríngea, enviando muestra a biopsia diferida, resultando lesión metastásica de CCR células claras. Evaluado por nefrología, se pesquisa tumor renal izquierdo sugerente de CCR. Las metástasis de neoplasias remotas a laringe son infrecuentes. Se considera al CCR el tercero en frecuencia respecto a neoplasias infraclaviculares. Éstas se pueden presentar hasta 10 años después del tratamiento del primario. Se recomienda seguimiento a largo plazo y énfasis a nuevos síntomas en región de cabeza y cuello, teniendo en consideración antecedente de CCR en pacientes con disfonía y lesiones polipoídeas en cuerdas vocales.

Introduction: The metastasis of distant site primary tumors to the vocal cords is infrequent. The most frequent source of metastasis to the larynx is melanomas and carcinomas, mainly affecting the supraglottic region. The metastasis to the head and neck of renal cell carcinomas (RCC) has an incidence of 14-16%. To present a case of metastasis of clear renal cell carcinoma to the vocal cords, since it is very infrequent, and there are no similar reports in the country. A male patient, 57 years old, presenting dysphonia for a duration of 3 months. Nasofibroscopy showed a polypoid lesion in the left vocal cord and ventricle. Larynx microsurgery was performed, and a sample was sent for biopsy, which reported a metastatic lesion of RCC clear cells. When assessed by nephrology, a left renal tumor is found, suggesting RCC. The metastasis of distant site neoplasias are infrequent. RCC is considered the third in frequency concerning to infraclavicular neoplasias. These can present up to 10 years after the treatment of the primary. Long term follow-up is recommended, and an emphasis on new symptoms in the head and neck region, considering the history of RCC in patients with dysphonia and polypoid lesions in vocal cords.

Metástasis bilateral de húmero, en paciente con cáncer renal, tratado con inmunoterapia y cirugía: reporte de un caso / Bilateral Humeral metastases, in a patient with renal cancer, treated with immunotherapy and surgery: case report

El carcinoma de células renales es el 7mo cáncer en frecuencia a nivel mundial con más de 300.000 casos nuevos al año y es la 3era malignidad genitourinaria más frecuente. El sitio más común de metástasis es el pulmón mientras que el esqueleto ocupa el segundo lugar con una frecuencia que varía entre un 20% a un 35%. Se ha reportado una sobrevida de 12 meses en promedio luego de la aparición de metástasis óseas. Reporte del caso de un paciente con diagnóstico de cáncer renal de células claras y metástasis óseas (en columna, pelvis y ambos húmeros), que evoluciona con fractura de ambos brazos. El paciente es aceptado en un ensayo clínico de tratamiento con inmunoterapia y además se somete a una reducción y osteosíntesis bilateral de húmero con clavo endomedular, logrando la consolidación de ambas fracturas y, por ende, la regresión de la enfermedad.

Renal cell carcinoma is ranked 7th in frequent cancer worldwide with more than 3000.000 new cases per year, as well as it's ranked 3rd in frequent genitourinary malignancy. The most common area of metastases is lung followed by skeleton in second place. The frequency of skeleton metastases varies from 20% to 35%. A survival average time of 12 months is generally observed after the appearance of bone metastases. This case report is about a patient diagnosed with clear cell renal cancer and bone metastases (in the spine, pelvis and both humerus) that evolves with fracture of both arms. The patient undergoes a clinical trial with immunotherapy and also a reduction and osteosynthesis of both arms with intramedullary nail, achieving consolidation of both fractures and regression of the disease.

Clinical and pathological analysis of renal cell carcinoma bone metastasis / 北京大学学报(医学版)

OBJECTIVE@#To analyze the clinical and pathological characteristics of renal cell carcinoma bone metastasis (RCC-BM) patients.@*METHODS@#Data of RCC-BM patients from July 2003 to November 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. The patients' baseline characteristics (age, gender), tumor characteristics [specific sites of bone metastasis, time to bone metastasis (TTBM), imaging features of bone disease, coexistence of other metastasis], as well as pathological features (histological classification of primary and bone metastasis, immunohistochemical stain results) were collected. Descriptive analysis and difference analysis were used.@*RESULTS@#A total of 113 RCC-BM patients were enrolled with the gender ratio (male:female) of 4:1, mean age of 59.39 years, and all present of osteolysis bone lesions. The common sites of bone metastasis were vertebra (46.0%) and pelvis (38.9%). Other distant metastasis sites coexisted in 28.3%, while 48.18% RCC-BM patients presented with synchronous metastasis (TTBM=0). The median TTBM for metachronous metastasis was 48 months. The majority in this cohort were determined to have primary tumor of clear cell carcinoma. After immunohistochemical examination to 104 RCC-BM patients and sub-group analysis, tendencies of higher positive rates of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) was also found in synchronous group (P=0.097) while tendencies of higher positive rates of carbonic anhydrase (CA)-IX was found in the same group (P=0.100). The patients with clear cell RCC-BM had a significantly higher positive expression of epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR, P<0.05) than those with non-clear cell RCC-BM group.@*CONCLUSION@#More male and younger patients with metastatic lesions in axial skeleton were found in this cohort. Tendencies in the expression of CA-IX and VEGF in different TTBM sub-group and EGFR in different histology-derived subgroup indicate that they might be associated with risk and prognostic factors and support further target therapies of RCC-BM.

Simultaneous meningioma and brain metastasis from renal cell carcinoma - a rare presentation. Case report / Meningioma e metástase cerebral de carcinoma de células renais simultâneos - uma apresentação rara. Relato de caso

ABSTRACT CONTEXT: Brain metastases are the most common tumors of the central nervous system. Because of their high frequency, they may be associated with rare situations. Among these are tumor-to-tumor metastasis and an even a rarer situation called simultaneous brain tumors, which are more related to primary tumors of the reproductive and endocrine systems. CASE REPORT: A 56-year-old male patient with a history of renal cell carcinoma (which had previously been resected) presented with a ventricular lesion (suggestive of metastatic origin) and simultaneous olfactory groove lesion (probably a meningioma). First, only the ventricular lesion was dealt with, but after a year, the meningothelial lesion increased and an occipital lesion appeared. Therefore, both of these were resected in a single operation. All the procedures were performed by the same neurosurgeon. The patient evolved without neurological deficits during the postoperative period. After these two interventions, the patient remained well and was referred for adjuvant treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides the first description of an association between these two tumors. Brain metastases may be associated with several lesions, and rare presentations such as simultaneity with meningioma should alert neurosurgeons to provide the best oncological treatment.

RESUMO CONTEXTO: As metástases cerebrais são os tumores mais comuns do sistema nervoso central e, devido à sua elevada frequência, podem estar associadas a situações raras. Entre estas estão as "tumor to tumor metastasis" e uma situação ainda mais rara chamada de tumores cerebrais simultâneos, mais relacionados a tumores primários dos sistemas endocrinológico e reprodutivo. RELATO DE CASO: Um homem de 56 anos com histórico de câncer de células renais (extirpado previamente) apresentou-se com lesão ventricular (sugestiva de origem metastática) e simultaneamente com uma lesão em topografia de goteira olfatória (provavelmente meningioma). Primeiramente, apenas a lesão ventricular foi abordada, porém após um ano, a lesão meningotelial aumentou e uma lesão occipital apareceu e então ambas foram ressecadas em uma única cirurgia. Todos os procedimentos foram realizados pelo mesmo neurocirurgião. O paciente evoluiu sem déficits neurológicos no período pós-operatório. Após essas duas intervenções, o paciente permaneceu bem, sendo encaminhado para tratamento adjuvante. CONCLUSÕES: O presente trabalho é a primeira descrição da associação encontrada entre esses dois tumores. As metástases cerebrais podem associar-se a várias lesões, e manifestações raras, tais como apresentação simultânea com meningioma, devem alertar o neurocirurgião a fornecer o melhor tratamento oncológico.

Validation of preoperative variables and stratification of patients to help predict benefit of cytoreductive nephrectomy in the targeted therapy ERA

ABSTRACT Objectives To further elucidate which patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) may benefit from cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) before targeted therapy (TT), and to assess the overall survival of patients undergoing CN and TT versus TT alone. Materials and Methods We identified 88 patients who underwent CN at our institution prior to planned TT and 35 patients who received TT without undergoing CN. Preoperative risk factors described in the literature were assessed in our patient population (serum albumin, liver metastasis, symptomatic metastasis, clinical ≥T3 disease, retroperitoneal and supradiaphragmatic lymphadenopathy). Patients were stratified by number of pretreatment risk factors and overall survival (OS) was compared. Results TT patients had significantly more risk factors compared to CN patients (3.06 vs. 2.11, p<0.01). Patients who received TT alone had median OS of 5.8 months. All but one patient receiving TT alone had two or more risk factors. A comparison of the CN and TT groups was performed by constructing Kaplan-Meier curves. There was no significant difference in median OS for those patients with exactly two risk factors (447 vs. 389 days, p=0.24), and those with three or more risk factors (184 vs. 155 days, p=0.87). Conclusions Using previously described pretreatment risk factors we found that patients with two or more risk factors derived no significant survival advantage from CN in the TT era. These risk factors should be incorporated in the assessment of patients for CN.

Diagnostic relevance of metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the head and neck: An evaluation of 22 cases in 671 patients

ABSTRACT Purpose Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a malignant tumor that metastasizes early, and patients often present with metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis. The aim of our evaluation was to assess the diagnostic and differential diagnostic relevance of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with particular emphasis on head and neck manifestations in a large patient series. Patients and methods We retrospectively evaluated 671 consecutive patients with RCC who were treated in our urology practice between 2000 and 2013. Results Twenty-four months after diagnosis, 200/671 (30%) of RCC had metastasized. Distant metastases were found in 172 cases, with 22 metastases (3.3%) in the head and neck. Cervical and cranial metastases were located in the lymph nodes (n=13) and in the parotid and the thyroid gland, tongue, the forehead skin, skull, and paranasal sinuses (n=9). All head and neck metastases were treated by surgical excision, with 14 patients receiving adjuvant radiotherapy and 9 patients receiving chemotherapy or targeted therapy at some point during the course of the disease. Five patients (23%) survived. The mean time of survival from diagnosis of a head and neck metastasis was 38 months, the shortest period of observation being 12 months and the longest 83 months. Discussion and conclusion Our findings show that while RCC metastases are rarely found in the neck, their proportion among distantly metastasized RCC amounts to 13%. Therefore, the neck should be included in staging investigations for RCC with distant metastases, and surgical management of neck disease considered in case of resectable metastatic disease. Similarly, in patients presenting with a neck mass with no corresponding tumor of the head and neck, a primary tumor below the clavicle should be considered and the appropriate staging investigations initiated.

Sunitinib treatment in patients with advanced renal cell cancer: the Brazilian National Cancer Institute (INCA) experience

ABSTRACT Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of sunitinib treatment in a non-screened group of patients with metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) treated by the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS) at a single reference institution. Material and Methods: Retrospective cohort study, which evaluated patients with mRCC who received sunitinib between May 2010 and December 2013. Results: Fifty-eight patients were eligible. Most patients were male 41 (71%), with a median age of 58 years. Nephrectomy was performed in 41 (71%) patients with a median interval of 16 months between the surgery and initiation of sunitinib. The most prevalent histological subtype was clear cell carcinoma, present in 52 (91.2%) patients. In 50 patients (86%), sunitinib was the first line of systemic treatment. The main adverse effects were fatigue (57%), hypothyroidism (43%), mucositis (33%) and diarrhea (29%). Grade 3 and 4 adverse effects were infrequent: fatigue (12%), hypertension (12%), thrombocytopenia (7%), neutropenia (5%) and hand-foot syndrome (5%). Forty percent of patients achieved a partial response and 35% stable disease, with a disease control rate of 75%. Median progression free survival was 7.6 months and median overall survival was 14.1 months. Conclusion: Sunitinib treatment was active in the majority of patients, especially those with low and intermediate risk by MSKCC score, with manageable toxicity. Survival rates were inferior in this non-screened population with mRCC treated in the SUS.

Seguridad y eficacia del sorafenib en el carcinoma renal metastasico avanzado que progresa despues del tratamiento de primera linea con sunitinib / Safety and efficacy of sorafenib in advanced metastatic renal cell carcinoma progressing after first-line treatment with sunitinib

INTRODUCCIÓN: Antecedentes: El presente informe expone la evaluación del medicamento sorafenib a su uso, en pacientes con carcinoma renal metastásico que progresa al tratamiento de primera línea con sunitinib. Aspectos Generales: El carcinoma de células renales (CCR) es un tipo de cáncer del riñon que se origina en las células de los túbulos renales y contienen muchos vasos sanguíneos. El CCR es responsable del 80 al 85% de las neoplasias renales primarias. Cerca del 8% del resto de las otras neoplasias provienen de las células transicionales de la pelvis renal. Tecnología Sanitaria de Interés: Sorafenib: Sorafenib es un inhibidor multiquinasa que inhibe el desarrollo de los vasos sanguíneos del tumor y la proliferación de las células tumorales. Esta droga tiene una acción dual, inhibiendo la casa cascada raf y los receptores de los factores de crecimiento derivado de plaquetas (PDGF) y de crecimiento endotelial vascular (VEGF), presentes en las células tumorales, en las células endoteliais y en los pericitos. El Sorafenib está autorizado para el tratamiento de pacientes con CCR avanzado en quienes el tratamiento con Interferón alfa o interleuquina-2 han fallado o está contraindicado. Sorafenib se administra oralmente con dosis recomendadas para el CCR avanzado de 400 mg dos veces al día. El tratamiento debe interrumpirse cuando aparezcan eventos adversos inaceptables para el paciente. METODOLOGÍA: Estrategia de Búsqueda: Se realizó una búsqueda de la literatura con respecto a la eficacia y seguridad del sorafenib como tratamiento de segunda línea en pacientes con CCRm o avanzado progresivo a un tratameinto de primera líena con sunitinib, en las bases de datos de OVID MEDLINE y TRIPDABASE. También se hizo una búsqueda adicional en www.clinicals.ogv, para poder identificar ensayos en desarrollo. Adicionalmente, se hizo una búsqueda dentro de la inforamción generada por grupos que realizan revisiones sistemáticas, evalución de tecnologías sanitarias y guías de práctica clínica, tales como The Cochrane Library, The National Institute for Health and Care Excelence (NICE) y la European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO). RESULTADOS: Sinopsis de la Evidencia: Se realizó la búsqueda bibliográfica y de evidencia científica para el sustento del uso de sorafenib como tratamiento de segunda línea en pacientes con CCRM que progresaron a pesar del tratamiento de primera línea con sunitinib. Solo se identificaron dos GPC que cumplieram los criterios de elegibilidad. CONCLUSIONES: no se ha encontrado evidencia respecto al beneficio y riesgo del uso de sorafenib como tratamiento de segunda línea en pacientes con CCRm que progresan después del tratamiento con sunitinib, respecto al tratamiento de soporte o placebo. Las guías identificadas en esta evaluación recomiendan el uso de sorafenib solo en pacientes que progresan después de recibir tratamiento a base de citoquinas, pero no está incluido en las recomendaciones si el paciente progreso después de recibir medicamentos dirigidos a VEGF. Otros medicamentos diferentes a sorafenib vienen siendo evaluados en pacientes con CCRm progresaron después de recibir medicamentos a los VEGF. Dado que no existe evidencia que responda a la pregunta PICO de esta evaluación, el Instituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación-IETSI, no aprueba el uso de sorafenib para el tratamiento de pacientes con CCRm que progresarion después del tratamiento con sunitinib.

Eficacia y seguridad de sunitinib en comparación con interferon Alfa 2a en pacientes con diagnósticos de carcinoma renal de células claras metastásico sin tratamiento previo / Efficacy and safety of sunitinib compared to interferon alfa 2a in patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma without prior treatment

INTRODUCCIÓN: Antecedentes: El presente informe expone la evaluación del medicamento sunitinib respecto a su uso en pacientes con carcinoma renal de células claras metastásico que no hayan recibido tratamiento previo. Aspectos Generales: El carcinoma de células renames (CCR) representa el 2-3% de todas las neoplasias malignas a vinel mundial, siendo la séptima causa más común de cáncer en varones y la novena causa más común en mujeres. En perú, el 1.7% de todos los casos de cáncer reportados entre el 2006 y el 2011 fueron de origen renal. El carcinoma renal de células claras representa el 65-90% de todos los CCR (4-6) por lo que la mayor parte de estudios en CCR se hacen tomando como referencia a esta población. Tecnología Sanitaria de Interés: Sunitinib: Sunitinib es un inhibidor de un grupo de receptores de tirosina quinasa altamente relacionados. El sunitinib inhibe los receptores del VEGF y del factor de crecimiento derivado de plaquetas (PDFG, por sus siglas en inglés) en las células cancerígenas, células endoteliales vasculares y pericitos, inhibiendo la proliferación de células tumorales y el desarrollo de vasos sanguíneos tumorales. METODOLOGÍA: Estratégia de Búsqueda: Se realizó una búsqueda de la literatura con respecto al efecto de sunitinib sobre la sobrevida global, sobrevida libre de enfermedad, calidad de vida, perfil de eventos adversos y tasa de respuesta objetiva de pacientes con carcinoma renal de células claras metastásico sin tratamiento previo, en comparación con interferón alfa 2a, en las bases de datos MEDLINE. Se hizo una búsqueda adicional en www.clinicaltrials.gov, para poder identificar ensayos aun en elaboración o que no hayan sido publicados. Adicionalmente, se hizo una búsqueda dentro de la información generada por grupos que realizan revisiones sistemáticas, evaluación de tecnologías sanitarias y guías de práctica clínica, tales como The Cochrane Library, The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), The National Guideline for Clearinghouse y The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). RESULTADOS: Se realizó la búsqueda bibliográfica y de evidencia científica que sustente el uso de sunitinib como tratamiento de primera línea para pacientes con diagnóstico de CCR de células claras metastásico sin tratamiento previo. Se presente la evidencia identificada y correspondiente a guías de práctica clínica, revisiones sistemáticas y meta-análisis de los últimos 5 años; y ensayos clínicos aleatorizados de 2 anõs de antiguedad de acuerdo a los criterios de elegibilidad expuestos, excepto para el desenlace de calidad de vida en el que se amplió la búsqueda hasta el 2007 por no haber estudios recientes. CONCLUSIONES: De acuerdo a la revisión de las información existente, se concluye que el fármaco sunitinib administrado en dosis de 50 mg por día, en ciclos de 6 semanas (4 semanas de fármaco seguidas de 2 semanas de descanso) es una intervención recomendada sobre el INF-alfa 2a, para el tratamiento de primera línea de pacientes con cercinoma renal de células sin tratamiento previo, de pronóstico bueno o intermédio. Los estudios muestran un aumento consistente y significativo tanto de la sobrevida de enfermedad y la tasa de respuesta objetiva, así como e mismo perfil de eventos adversos. Sunitib mejora significativamente la calidad de vida relacionada a salud en estos pacientes, en comparación con INF-alfa, el cual se encuentra en el Petitorio Farmacoterapéutico de Essalud. El uso de sunitinib para pacientes de mal pronóstico no está recomendado. El Instituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación-IETSI, aprueba uso de sunitinib en cáncer renal de células claras metastásico sin tratamiento previo.

Needle tract seeding following percutaneous biopsy of renal cell carcinoma

A 66-year-old man underwent computed tomography-guided needle biopsy of a suspicious renal mass. Two months later he underwent partial nephrectomy. Histology revealed a 30-mm clear cell renal cell carcinoma, up to Fuhrman grade 3. An area of the capsule was interrupted, which corresponded to a hemorrhagic area on the cortical surface. Under microscopy, this area showed a tongue of tumor tissue protruding through the renal capsule. A tumor deposit was found in the perinephric fat. These features suggest that tumor seeding may have occurred during the needle biopsy.

Activity and safety of sunitinib in poor risk metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients

Purpose To assess the activity, safety and treatment patterns of sunitinib in patients with poor-risk metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Materials and Methods We retrospectively reviewed the charts of poor risk patients treated with sunitinib from October 2006 to July 2013 who met the eligibility criteria. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Tumor radiological response was measured according to RECIST 1.1 and adverse events (AEs) were assessed through standard criteria. Results Median OS was 8.16 months (95% CI, 5.73-10.59). Of the 53 patients included in this analysis, 9 (17.0%) achieved partial response, 12 (22.6%) had stable disease. Median treatment duration was 3.30 months (95% CI: 1.96-4.63) and 26.4% of patients discontinued treatment due to toxicity. Grade 3 or higher AEs occurred in 39.6% of patients, the most common being fatigue (15.1%), neutropenia (9.5%), nausea, vomiting and diarrhea (7.5% each). Discussion Sunitinib may benefit some unselected poor-risk patients, although the rates of AEs and drug discontinuation suggest a need for careful patient monitoring. .

Systematic review and meta-analysis of target terapies for the treatment of metastatic renal cancer

Objectives At present there are several drugs for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (ARCC). The main objective of this work was to perform a systematic review (SR) and meta-analysis (MA) of clinical randomized studies that compared target cell therapies (TCT). Materials and Methods SR identified clinical randomized trials that compared TCT versus interferon-alpha in the treatment of patients with ARCC. In order to analyze efficiency, it was evaluated free-survival progression (FSP), total survival (TS) and response rate (RR). Results In relation to first line treatment, seven studies of TCT were identified using sunitinib, sorafenib, bevacizumab and temsirolimus; and two studies with sorafenib and everolimus for second line treatment. Relative risk (RRi) of MA for FSP of first line therapies was: 0.83, CI = 0.78-0.87, I2 = 94% and p < 0.00001. Best results of RR of specific FSP among studies were: 0.38, sunitinib, CI = 0.25-0.58, bevacizumab, 0.62, CI = 0.47-0.83; and temsirolimus, 0.78, CI = 0.70-0.87. MA didn't show any benefit regarding TS of first line treatment of all analyzed drugs. As for RR significant results were: sunitinib, 3.83 CI = 2.86-5.12; bevacizumab, 2.52 CI = 1.78-3.57 and bevacizumab, 1.97 CI = 1.43-2.71. Conclusions: For first line treatment, sunitinib was the most effective TCT in relation to FPS; there was no alteration of TS and RR was small but significant for sunitinib and bevacizumab. Available studies could not conclude any results for second line treatments. .

Prognostic factors in renal cell carcinoma: analysis of 227 patients treated at the Brazilian National Cancer Institute

PURPOSE: We evaluated the role of several prognostic factors in predicting death and/or progressive disease in patients with renal cell carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2004 and 2010, 227 consecutive patients with renal cell carcinoma underwent radical nephrectomy at our Institute. All histological specimens were examined by the same pathologist. We considered certain histological parameters, including histological subtype, conventional Fuhrman grade, presence of sarcomatoid features, adrenal gland infiltration, invasion of the perinephric fat, vascular embolization, collecting system invasion, presence or absence of tumour necrosis (0%, 1% to 49%, or 50% or greater) and regional lymph node metastasis. RESULTS: Variables significantly associated with death and/or progressive disease on univariate analysis were histological subtype (p = 0.006), Fuhrman grade (p < 0.0001), tumor necrosis (p = 0.009), perinephric fat invasion (p = 0.002), vascular embolization (p = 0.0002), presence of lymph node involvement (p < 0.002), tumor size (p = 0.0006), TNM stage (p < 0.00001) and presence of metastasis (p < 0.00001). In the multivariable model histological subtype, tumor necrosis, lymph node involvement and presence of metastasis were independent risk factors for disease-free survival (p = 0.011, 0.042, 0.025 and p < 0.0001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Histological subtype, tumor necrosis, lymph node involvement and presence of metastasis proved to be independent prognostic factors for disease-free survival. Therefore, the presence and rate of tumor necrosis should always be informed by the pathologist and lymphadenectomy should be performed in all patients.

Carcinoma de células renais com metástase cutânea: relato de caso / Renal cell carcinoma with cutaneous metastasis: case report

O adenocarcinoma do rim, ou hipernefroma, é a terceira neoplasia mais comum do trato geniturinário, sendo o de células claras o tipo principal, representando 60 por cento dos casos, com pico de incidência entre 50 e 70 anos. A presença de metástase ao diagnóstico acomete em torno de 30 por cento dos pacientes, tendo como principais sítios pulmões, ossos, pele, fígado e cérebro. Relatamos o caso de um paciente portador de carcinoma de células renais com metástase ao diagnóstico que, apesar de inserido na faixa etária predominante, tipo histológico mais frequente e quadro clínico característico, apresentava metástase a distância em local pouco observado na prática clínica. O paciente evoluiu para o óbito sem tempo hábil para o tratamento.

Renal cell carcinoma or hypernephroma is the third most common neoplasia of the genitourinary tract. Its most common type, representing 60 percent of the cases, is the clear cell carcinoma, with an incidence peak between 50 and 70 years. Metastases are present at the time of diagnosis in approximately 30 percent of the patients, the major sites being lungs, bones, skin, liver, and brain. We report the case of a male patient with renal cell carcinoma, whose age, clinical findings, and tumor histological type matched with the most common ones for that pathology. Nevertheless, he already had distant metastasis in an uncommon site at the time of diagnosis. The patient died without undergoing specific treatment for renal cell carcinoma.

Metástasis pancreáticas tardías secundarias a cáncer de células renales: Caso clínico / Pancreatic metastasis from renal cell carcinoma: A case report

We report the case of a 60 year old woman with multiple pancreatic nodules found on abdominal computed tomography. Thirteen years earlier she had undergone a left nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. The patient underwent surgery with a preoperative diagnosis of multifocal metastatic or neuroendocrine tumor. At surgery, two metastatic nodules of renal cell carcinoma were found and excised. After four years of follow up there is no evidence of recurrence.

Pituitary gland metastasis from renal cell carcinoma presented as a non-functioning macroadenoma / Metástase de carcinoma de células renais para hipófise simulando macroadenoma não funcionante

Metastatic tumors involving the pituitary gland are an uncommon finding and occur in up to 1 percent of all pituitary tumor resections. A 74-year-old man had progressive vision deterioration, over the 30 days prior to consultation. He did not complain of headache or polyuria, but referred to intestinal constipation. Five years ago, he underwent a right radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma, followed by chemotherapy and radiotherapy for lung and parotid metastases. On ophthalmologic examination, there was a left abducens nerve palsy and bitemporal hemianopia. Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated a sellar mass with suprasellar cistern extension compressing the optic chiasm. Endocrinological evaluation revealed central adrenal and gonadal insufficiencies. The patient underwent a transsphenoidal tumor resection that revealed renal cell carcinoma. This case illustrates that metastatic pituitary lesions can mimic typical symptoms and signs of pituitary macroadenoma. Furthermore, clinical diabetes insipidus, a common finding of pituitary metastases, can be absent.

Metástases de neoplasias para hipófise são incomuns e ocorrem em até 1 por cento dos tumores de hipófise. Apresentamos o caso de um homem de 74 anos de idade com progressiva deterioração visual nos 30 dias que antecederam seu atendimento. Ele negava cefaleia ou poliúria e queixava-se de constipação intestinal. O paciente havia sido submetido à nefrectomia radical para carcinoma de células renais cinco anos antes, seguida de quimioterapia e radioterapia por metástases pulmonares e parotídea. Ao exame oftalmológico, apresentava paralisia do nervo abducente esquerdo e hemianopsia bitemporal. A ressonância magnética demonstrou uma massa selar com extensão suprasselar comprimindo o quiasma óptico. Na avaliação endocrinológica apresentava insuficiência adrenal e gonadal centrais. O paciente foi submetido à ressecção transesfenoidal da lesão que, ao exame anatomopatológico, se revelou como carcinoma de células renais. Esse caso demonstra que a presença de lesões metastáticas na hipófise pode mimetizar sinais e sintomas de macroadenoma não funcionante e que o diabetes insípido central, comum nas lesões metastáticas para hipófise, pode estar ausente.